Friday, November 18, 2005

A letter sent to U.S. Congressman Peter T. King of New York's 3rd District.

If you agree, please do your part to try and end this insanity. Contact your local representative or Senator. DO SOMETHING! I'm tired of seeing our troops come home in body bags and listening to lies being spun off like some lousy soap opera. Polls show that Americans are tired of this war. Well it's time we all said so in black and white!

To the Honorable Peter T. King:

I have read the statement by Jack Murtha (see below) and I couldn't agree more. Whether or not you supported the initial reason for going to war in Iraq, it is obvious that this has turned into a fiasco.

Our continued presence there can only serve to further incite the insurgency, bringing more attacks and death, which will only be a setback to Iraqi autonomy.

It is time to bring our troops home; time to cut our losses and rebuild our economy. Arguments by the Administration that we are fighting some kind of war on terrorism, when there has been no proof that there ever was a link between Iraq and the 9/11 attacks are absurd.

Two and half years, 2,000 plus military deaths, and billions in debt are enough. Common sense must prevail. Let's bring them home, NOW!

Sincerely,


Peter Fegan


For Immediate Release
November 17, 2005

The Honorable John P. Murtha
War in Iraq

(Washington D.C.)- The war in Iraq is not going as advertised. It is a flawed policy wrapped in illusion. The American public is way ahead of us. The United States and coalition troops have done all they can in Iraq, but it is time for a change in direction. Our military is suffering. The future of our country is at risk. We can not continue on the present course. It is evident that continued military action in Iraq is not in the best interest of the United States of America, the Iraqi people or the Persian Gulf Region.

General Casey said in a September 2005 Hearing, “the perception of occupation in Iraq is a major driving force behind the insurgency.” General Abizaid said on the same date, “Reducing the size and visibility of the coalition forces in Iraq is a part of our counterinsurgency strategy.”

For 2 ½ years I have been concerned about the U.S. policy and the plan in Iraq. I have addressed my concerns with the Administration and the Pentagon and have spoken out in public about my concerns. The main reason for going to war has been discredited. A few days before the start of the war I was in Kuwait – the military drew a red line around Baghdad and said when U.S. forces cross that line they will be attacked by the Iraqis with Weapons of Mass Destruction – but the US forces said they were prepared. They had well trained forces with the appropriate protective gear.

We spend more money on Intelligence than all the countries in the world together, and more on Intelligence than most countries GDP. But the intelligence concerning Iraq was wrong. It is not a world intelligence failure. It is a U.S. intelligence failure and the way that intelligence was misused.

I have been visiting our wounded troops at Bethesda and Walter Reed hospitals almost every week since the beginning of the War. And what demoralizes them is going to war with not enough troops and equipment to make the transition to peace; the devastation caused by IEDs; being deployed to Iraq when their homes have been ravaged by hurricanes; being on their second or third deployment and leaving their families behind without a network of support.

The threat posed by terrorism is real, but we have other threats that cannot be ignored. We must be prepared to face all threats. The future of our military is at risk. Our military and their families are stretched thin. Many say that the Army is broken. Some of our troops are on their third deployment. Recruitment is down, even as our military has lowered its standards. Defense budgets are being cut. Personnel costs are skyrocketing, particularly in health care. Choices will have to be made. We can not allow promises we have made to our military families in terms of service benefits, in terms of their health care, to be negotiated away. Procurement programs that ensure our military dominance cannot be negotiated away. We must be prepared. The war in Iraq has caused huge shortfalls at our bases in the U.S.
Much of our ground equipment is worn out and in need of either serious overhaul or replacement. George Washington said, “To be prepared for war is one of the most effective means of preserving peace.” We must rebuild our Army. Our deficit is growing out of control. The Director of the Congressional Budget Office recently admitted to being “terrified” about the budget deficit in the coming decades. This is the first prolonged war we have fought with three years of tax cuts, without full mobilization of American industry and without a draft. The burden of this war has not been shared equally; the military and their families are shouldering this burden.

Our military has been fighting a war in Iraq for over two and a half years. Our military has accomplished its mission and done its duty. Our military captured Saddam Hussein, and captured or killed his closest associates. But the war continues to intensify. Deaths and injuries are growing, with over 2,079 confirmed American deaths. Over 15,500 have been seriously injured and it is estimated that over 50,000 will suffer from battle fatigue. There have been reports of at least 30,000 Iraqi civilian deaths.

I just recently visited Anbar Province Iraq in order to assess the conditions on the ground. Last May 2005, as part of the Emergency Supplemental Spending Bill, the House included the Moran Amendment, which was accepted in Conference, and which required the Secretary of Defense to submit quarterly reports to Congress in order to more accurately measure stability and security in Iraq. We have now received two reports. I am disturbed by the findings in key indicator areas. Oil production and energy production are below pre-war levels. Our reconstruction efforts have been crippled by the security situation. Only $9 billion of the $18 billion appropriated for reconstruction has been spent. Unemployment remains at about 60 percent. Clean water is scarce. Only $500 million of the $2.2 billion appropriated for water projects has been spent. And most importantly, insurgent incidents have increased from about 150 per week to over 700 in the last year. Instead of attacks going down over time and with the addition of more troops, attacks have grown dramatically. Since the revelations at Abu Ghraib, American casualties have doubled. An annual State Department report in 2004 indicated a sharp increase in global terrorism.

I said over a year ago, and now the military and the Administration agrees, Iraq can not be won “militarily.” I said two years ago, the key to progress in Iraq is to Iraqitize, Internationalize and Energize. I believe the same today. But I have concluded that the presence of U.S. troops in Iraq is impeding this progress.

Our troops have become the primary target of the insurgency. They are united against U.S. forces and we have become a catalyst for violence. U.S. troops are the common enemy of the Sunnis, Saddamists and foreign jihadists. I believe with a U.S. troop redeployment, the Iraqi security forces will be incentivized to take control. A poll recently conducted shows that over 80% of Iraqis are strongly opposed to the presence of coalition troops, and about 45% of the Iraqi population believe attacks against American troops are justified. I believe we need to turn Iraq over to the Iraqis.


I believe before the Iraqi elections, scheduled for mid December, the Iraqi people and the emerging government must be put on notice that the United States will immediately redeploy. All of Iraq must know that Iraq is free. Free from United States occupation. I believe this will send a signal to the Sunnis to join the political process for the good of a “free” Iraq.

My plan calls:

To immediately redeploy U.S. troops consistent with the safety of U.S. forces.
To create a quick reaction force in the region.
To create an over- the- horizon presence of Marines.
To diplomatically pursue security and stability in Iraq

This war needs to be personalized. As I said before I have visited with the severely wounded of this war. They are suffering.


Because we in Congress are charged with sending our sons and daughters into battle, it is our responsibility, our OBLIGATION to speak out for them. That’s why I am speaking out.

Our military has done everything that has been asked of them, the U.S. can not accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. IT IS TIME TO BRING THEM HOME.

(####)


Friday, November 11, 2005

WON'T GET FOOLED AGAIN!

"It is true that you may fool all of the people some of the time; you can even fool some of the people all of the time; but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time." - Abraham Lincoln

How ironic that a Republican President should coin a phrase that so completely and undeniably defines an administration that for five years has been running the same old sorry tale up the patriotic flag pole, hoping enough people will salute it. But 2005 was the year that saw the veil of deceit that has plagued this White House come unraveled.

Iraq, Hurricane Katrina, Harriet Miers, Scooter Libby, have all contributed to the demise of President Bush's approval rating, which now stands at an all-time low of 37%. Worse for this president, the job-approval rating for Congress has fallen to 29%. Polls show that 68% of Americans are dissatisfied with the way things are going in the country; the most negative assessment in nearly a decade. If the recent elections, in which Democrat Tim Kaine beat Republican Jerry Kilgore in heavily Republican Virginia and Democrats seized power in Suffolk County for the first time since native Americans were the dominant culture, are any indication of a sign of the times than 2006 may well become this president's Waterloo.

As someone once said, "It couldn't happen to a nicer or more deserving fellow." And still, this President persists in using his political shovel to cover up his own inadequacies. At a Veterans Day speech in front of veterans, Bush lashed out at his critics accusing them of trying to rewrite history and charged that they’re undercutting America’s forces on the front lines.

Sad how a president who has done nothing but rewrite history for his own intentions should accuse others of doing so, but finally, at last, his words appear to be falling on deaf ears. Even Republicans who supported him in years past are questioning his judgment. Senator Chuck Hagel (Rep-Nebraska) has, along with leading Democrats, been pressing the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee to move forward with an investigation into whether the administration manipulated intelligence. Others within his own party appear to be distancing themselves from Bush, worried about their own necks when they run for reelection in '06.

The nomination of Judge Sam Alito to the Supreme Court - an obvious choice to mollify the extreme right flank of his party - will no doubt be the subject of much heated debate when Congress reconvenes in January. That Bush did not get the nomination hearings in November, as he originally wanted, was a setback. In deed this president may be in for quite a few setbacks in the remaining years of his term. And all of them his own doing.

Of all the sayings I have come to learn there is one, which in this case couldn't be better indicative of George Bush, "Pride goeth before a fall." The arrogance of this president and his persistence in his own infallibility may well spell the political epitaph of an administration that, to quote a local sports caster, "stole defeat from the jaws of victory."